Will the upgrade pay for itself?
I use this before replacing working hardware just because the newer option uses less electricity. Compare average watts or annual kWh, then see whether the savings can repay the purchase.
Enable JavaScript to calculate. The formula and worked example below are available without it.
Calculations run in your browser. Your entered values are not sent to me. A copied link includes your values after the # sign.
Start with the right purchase cost
The number that belongs in net replacement cost depends on the decision. If the current device works and I would otherwise keep it, I use the full cost of buying and setting up the replacement, less any resale money I can actually expect. If replacement is already unavoidable, I compare only the extra cost of choosing the more efficient option over an adequate alternative.
That boundary matters more than a clever formula. Charging an efficiency upgrade for a purchase I had to make anyway can make a good choice look bad. Pretending a working device has no remaining value can make an unnecessary replacement look better than it is.
Use watts or annual kWh
Average watts plus daily runtime works well for computers, network equipment, and other loads I can measure consistently. Annual kWh works better when a meter or comparable energy label already accounts for cycling behavior. Refrigerators, dehumidifiers, and similar equipment should not be compared from one momentary watt reading.
Both annual-kWh inputs need the same boundary. If the current figure includes an external storage enclosure or supporting equipment, the replacement figure must include whatever it needs to provide the same service.
The formulas
Annual saving = current annual kWh × rate − replacement annual kWh × rate
Payback years = net replacement cost ÷ annual saving
Five-year net saving = annual saving × 5 − net replacement cost
In watts mode, the calculator first converts each device to annual kWh using watts × daily hours ÷ 1,000 × 365.
A worked example
Suppose an existing machine averages 80 W and an adequate replacement averages 15 W. At 24 hours a day, those inputs equal 700.8 kWh/year and 131.4 kWh/year. At $0.20/kWh, the annual saving is $113.88. A $250 net purchase takes about 2.20 years to recover through electricity savings and produces a modeled five-year net saving of $319.40.
If the same machines run only eight hours a day, annual saving falls to $37.96 and payback stretches to about 6.59 years. Operating time can matter as much as the efficiency difference.
What “no payback” means
If the replacement uses as much or more electricity, or the rate is zero, electricity cannot repay the purchase. That does not automatically make the replacement bad. Performance, reliability, noise, security updates, repairability, or a failed current device can still justify it. They are separate reasons and this calculator does not assign them invented dollar values.
What this estimate leaves out
This is simple, undiscounted payback at a constant electricity price, not a full investment model. It excludes financing, maintenance, changing prices, future resale, and manufacturing impacts. A five-year result assumes both choices can provide the required service for five years; it is not a lifespan prediction.
For a real computer example, read whether an old PC is worth replacing for electricity savings. For the smart-home equipment I would and would not buy again, see my firsthand buying rules.
Method
Annual operating cost is annual kWh multiplied by electricity price. The payback and five-year results are arithmetic comparisons of the entered assumptions. They do not rank products or fetch current prices. Methods and corrections.